“The Wire,” season five, episode eight:

The Passion of the McNutty

hbo-the-wire-final-season.jpgMuch as we hate to admit it, the penultimate episode of the fifth and final season of “The Wire,” shown tonight on HBO, was a true and brilliant return to form for David “McNutty” Simon, the crackpot genius whose comic failings we have been charting with such gusto in this space. The show was full of drama and pathos; chilling images, absurdist red herrings and the thrilling plot turns; marvelous acting, complex political maneuverings, and loose ends brought together mordantly. Indeed, all of the things we have known and loved about this show—all of the things that have been so irritatingly absent this season—were back.

The universe is a ticking clock; but the earth is, as the poet said, an old chaos. We are accordingly buffeted by precise mechanisms and random events; each of these forces play their roles tonight. It is a delight to see the various pairings here—Daniels and Perlman; Levy and Herc; Marlo and Chris—ponder their workings and their mischief. And clocks, too, play a role in Marlo’s downfall, Freamon’s redemption, even McNutty’s foolish imaginary serial killer, as the time runs out on Kima’s forbearance.

Watching “The Wire” this season has been much like a succession of painful dental procedures. We know, we believe, it will end sometime, but it scarcely makes the individual steps on the journey less discomfiting. And it hasn’t helped as own suspicions grew, with each passing visit, that the person in whom we’d entrusted ourselves—David Simon—was taking leave of his senses.

We don’t know whether it is due to a Dostoyeveskian moment of lucidity or an accident; a respite, sheer chance, or a incipient mutiny on the part of his crew or perhaps his masters at HBO as the fifth season progressed; but we are just happy that this particular episode didn’t suck beans the way the others have, and we are suddenly and giddily optimistic about the last.

(The last episode, according to the HBO schedule, will be 93 minutes long; if you are Tivo-ing, it might be smart to record the immediately following program as well, so you don’t lose the final three minutes. The TV sites are reporting, incidentally, that there will be no on-demand version of the last episode available the week before its formal showing.)

The bad old days of the dual imaginary serial killers are behind us. The aftertaste lingers, but we have distractions. Now that the absurd and unbelievable plot contortions of Scott “Smeagol” Templeton’s abuses are past, we can savor a chase: Intrepid city editor Gus Haynes is out to expose the fabricator, and the hunt is limned with a great deal of style and intrigue.

Similarly, over in the police department, we hear almost nothing of McNutty’s own serial killer itself, though he is now dealing with the consequences of his creation. But we’ve forgotten about it in any case, because Freamon’s wiretapping of the Stansfield gang produces the information the department needs to haul in the whole lot—Marlo, Chris and Cheese among them. This too, is handled with drive, economy and panache of “The Wire” of old, like the cop lying in a field doing surveillance slapping bugs.

After episode after episode of utter foolishness surrounding Clay Davis, even that thread of the show pays off, in an underplayed but powerful tête-à-tête between the mountebank state senator and a very cool Freeman. After several episodes in which he chewed the scenery, delighting his partisans but not impressing the rest of us, actor Isiah Whitlock Jr. here gets to play Davis down: reflective, sharp and lethal. We’re delighted to see as well that the Davis plot strain is brought back into the main action.

Now, not everything is hunky dory:

° Since David Simon’s bugaboo is the Tribune Company, we are forced to listen to more of his proselytizing. One character utters this cludgy line: “These newspaper chain guys just don’t give a fuck, do they?” It’s amazing how the ear of Simon and his writers, generally so resonant, go tinny in the newsroom. Indeed, the show still flirts with the narrative incoherence that has been driving us batty this season, all because of Simon’s nostalgia for the good old get-me-rewrite days. For example. Haynes asks a veteran reporter at the paper to look into Templeton’s stories. “Quiet, subtle, discreet,” Haynes says. So the reporter walks into the paper’s library and announces, “I need you to give me a global printout of everything under Scott Tempelton’s byline… all of it, every edition!” You can also see how far back in the past Simon is living, as well. Neither Haynes nor the reporter was familiar with the internets, a mysterious contraption that lets one read the work of newspaper reporters in the comfort of one’s home, with the help of a newfangled device called a “personal computer.” (Every newsroom in the world, incidentally, also has an in-house computer database of the stories it publishes.)

° We have refrained from mentioning this in the past, mostly from exhaustion at charting the manifold exasperating plotting this season. But we will note here that the chances of a lawyer like Levy hiring an ex-cop like Herc and making him part of his inner circle of drug-ring conspirators is slightly less than zero. However this plays out, whether Levy figures out that Herc gave the cops Marlo’s phone number or not, the initial implausibility of this makes the whole thread a joke.

° And Simon can’t resist getting in some new Pulitzer digs at his fancypants top editors. Simon is so wrong on the subject of newspapering that you just want to smack him. Does he really think that trying to win Pulitzer prizes is a bad thing? You can chuckle at the process, but the same sort of routines go on at the NY and LA Times and most other good newspapers. The editors at the Sun are just getting their staff into the game, trying to get them the national recognition they deserve. In “The Wire,” as the effete editors smack their lips, it’s like something out of “I, Claudius.” Simon remains a knucklehead.

Some other interesting aspects of this episode:

° The word “evacuate” turns up again, this time in its scatological sense. In the first episode, Simon’s mouthpiece, Haynes, makes a big deal about a reporter’s using the word “evacuate” incorrectly. Simon and Haynes were wrong about that, on about five levels. There’s a certain justice here in the word being used here again in this sense, because Simon was full of crap the first time he used it.

° There are two plot threads to watch next week. One is Levy: Who is his source in the court house? What will become of Herc? The other is the internal police investigation that we assume will occur after Kima spills the beans on McNulty’s crazy scheme.

° Something must be done about Steve Earle’s facial hair.

° There was a dig at Showtime’s “Dexter.” “Check this out,” Dukie says to Michael, pointing at a show on the TV. ”There’s a serial killer, but he only be killin’ other serial killers!”

° We have to note the passing of Snoop. If memory serves, we first caught a glimpse of her spraying a corner from the back of a motorcycle. Her arresting presence came again at the start of the fourth season, buying a gunpowder-driven staple gun with a street patois that was both touching and filled with menace. As Chris’ horrifying sidekick, stoic and frighteningly amoral, she embodied the show’s most degraded humanity, but also one of its most elegant tropes: Amid this unfortunate city’s thousands of unfortunates, she was an urban success story, performing admirably in a position perfectly suited to her talents.

* And we say goodbye to Bug and Dukie as well and perhaps Michael too. While in this season Simon has gotten a little precious about it, there is an enormously touching strain of humanism that has run through the portrayals of many of the supporting characters, no matter where they end up. (Part of this is due to the participation of novelist George Pellicanos, who has shown himself a master of this in his crime novels.) While our glimpse of Namond is two pat by half, there is something truly Dickensian, in the most elevated, and bleakest, sense of the word, as we see Michael and Dukie part, one a child and one with no more childhood to fall back on. Dukie recalls a moment he and Michael shared from one of the first episodes of last season, a moment any child might invest with deep significance: an ice cream after a scary run-in with an opposing gang. Michael is sad about parting with his makeshift family, and does his best to humor Dukie. But in his face you can see something missing as he endeavors to conjure up in his mind the moment from his childhood. He tries, but he can’t remember.

————

If you’re interested, Hitsville’s analyses of this season of “The Wire” are available below …

Episode one: As a journalist, David Simon is a pretty good showrunner
Episode two: David Simon continues to go crazy
Episode three: David Simon and the obsession that passeth all understanding
Episode four: “They call me Mr. McNutty!”
Episode five: David “McNutty” Simon and the Quantum of Solace!
Episode six: McNutty says, “I drink your milkshake!”
Episode seven: Preposterouser and preposterouser!
Episode eight: Whenever I call you friendo!

… with additional tangential expatiations on David Simon’s growing leave-taking of his senses here and here.

Finally, there’s a list of a lot of the ancillary reading of this season of “The Wire” here.


6 Comments so far

  1. Professor Of Pop March 3rd, 2008 10:47 am

    Maybe it’s the Sudafed, but I will confess: I cried. Yes, a very fine penultimate moment. I didn’t want it to end…

  2. UCrawford March 4th, 2008 12:40 am

    Agreed about the Sun plotline…I couldn’t believe just how stupid this was. What is Simon’s deal about pretending the Internet doesn’t exist? Never let the facts get in the way of a personal vendetta, I guess…especially when you’re a self-righteous prick who thinks capitalism is the problem with the world.

    And yes, I thought those “poor dockworkers” who were continually ripping off the businesses that shipped through them in season 2 got exactly what they deserved in the end…jailtime and unemployment. Apparently in Simon’s world anyone who has success in life deserves to get robbed by people who don’t. Not to gloat, but the seeds of Simon’s “everyone should hate rich people” agenda were quite apparent early on…it’s too bad HBO couldn’t keep him in check for one more season. But at least he seems to have pulled himself together for the final couple of episodes.

  3. UCrawford March 4th, 2008 12:47 am

    And by saying Simon hates “rich people” I also extend that to the editors at the Sun. Both of the people he based the editor characters on have experienced some substantial level of success in their personal careers (much of it apparently deserved), and although both had their personal failings (particularly in regards to Jim Haner’s work) I can’t help but think that part of Simon’s issue with them is just plain old run-of-the-mill professional jealousy from a talented, but deeply unhappy, man with extreme anger management issues.

  4. Daisy March 4th, 2008 12:50 pm

    Why don’t you argue against the thesis, instead of getting all vaporous about it? I’d like to read your thoughts on why Pulitzer-seeking journalism ISN’T like “teaching the test” (Leave No Story Behind), instead of this campy, offended name calling.

  5. hitsville March 4th, 2008 2:16 pm

    Thanks for the comments. UCrawford, there is a strain of unreconstructed leftism in Simon, isn’t there? All this talk about the “underlying causes.” As I think I have written in previous posts, I think readers are smart. They know what the rules of capitalism are—how sometimes nice people get screwed over. But they also want to know the details, particularly when something can be done. That’s something journalism can do.
    Daisy, I have detailed my issues with Pulitzers in previous posts. Didn’t mean to be vaporous. And I’m not a Pulitzers fan. (Don’t get me started on the criticism prize over the years.) But the problem with journalism is most definitely not that too many papers are attempting ambitious journalism worthy of consideration in this sphere. Simon is stacking the deck by having them buzzing around his cartoony fabricator. (And it’s entirely vague as to what this series really is; homelessness is a very old topic at this point and it’s hard to imagine anything new to be said on the subject.) In reality, there are any number of subjects in any city worthy of a Pulitzer-caliber series. It’s just a questions of choosing your battles and expending some resources. it’s really not done in the cartoony way Simon portrays it.

  6. Daisy March 5th, 2008 1:19 pm

    Thanks for the reply. I would disagree that the “cartoony” aspects of the Sun story are any different than the exaggerated and (let’s be honest) contrived plots & scenarios from the previous seasons. Rawls and Landsman; Polk and Mahone; Gerard & what’shisname, of “Like a forty-degree day!” fame; the police version of Marimow: they were all caricatures without a lot of depth when introduced, and each represented an institutional failure (or a writer’s vision of the institutional failure). The fictional Sun’s institutional failure is presented in a TV-drama way, which (from your comments on previous seasons) was not an issue for you when the institution was the police, the schools, or City Hall–Valchek, in particular, is more Smeagol than Templeton could ever hope to be.

    I accused you of being vaporous (which was me being a bitch, sorry) because of the near-poetic lengths to which you’ve gone to describe this season as silly. (Lord of the Rings and the war in Iraq?) Your reply to my comment was one of the more balanced criticisms of Simon I’ve read on Hitsville, and certainly is more in keeping with your other writings. I think you might be a little Simonesque in your attacks on him.

    Anyway. I enjoy a good argument, and your writing is lively enough to get me interested in a point of view which I disagree with, so thanks for that. I came in on a “He said what!?” link about The Wire, but I’ll keep reading after the finale, I’m sure.

Leave a reply